Legal Opinion
Ashley Atkins v. Walmart, et al.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided March 13, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00735Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ASHLEY ATKINS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:26cv735/TKW/ZCB WALMART, et al., Defendants. / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this employment discrimination action. After performing its screening duties under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court identified several deficiencies in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 11) and ordered Plaintiff to correct those deficiencies by filing a third amended complaint. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff has now filed a third amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Royal Canin U. S. A. v. WullschlegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Meredith T. Raney, Jr. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.