Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1965No. 37255PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

J. — Bribery, like murder, will out, particularly when the negotiations are broadcast by police radio transmitters.

The prosecuting attorney for King County charged Norman Wadie Austin and Patsy Gentile jointly as principals with bribing a Seattle police detective to influence his actions in a grand larceny prosecution. Gentile later pleaded guilty to the bribery charge and received a sentence of 10 years imprisonment; Austin went to trial and from a judgment and sentence of 10 years imprisonment appeals, making 13 assignments of error from which three questions of law emerge. First, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. WhetstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. KelseyWashington Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Mountlake Terrace v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. State v. HumburgsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Blake Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. SaxonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API