Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 7329SC702PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion to quash the bill of indictment, the denial of his motions for judgment as of nonsuit interposed at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the portions of the charge to the jury. All of defendant’s assignments are based upon the conten tion that the indictment does not charge, and the evidence does not show, that he offered a bribe to influence a public official in the performance of his official duty.

The indictment úpon which the defendant was tried, in pertinent part, reads: .

“ * * * The legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BegynSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
  4. State v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Williams v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. HairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API