Legal Opinion

Oosterwyk v. Corrigan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The record discloses that Gerhardus Oosterwyk, acting in the capacity of his own attorney, and Efren Quiroz commenced the instant action in the circuit court for Milwaukee county on February 10, 1956. The complaint alleges:

“1. That at all times hereafter mentioned the plaintiffs were and are residents of Milwaukee county, Wisconsin; that the plaintiff, Gerhardus Oosterwyk, resides at 1835 West McKinley Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and is now employed as a common laborer; that the plaintiff, Efran [Efren] C. Quiroz, resides now at West Lloyd street, Milwaukee, and his occupation is that of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hintz v. Darling Freight, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Krause v. HartwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Oosterwyk v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AlfonsiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ceplina v. South Milwaukee School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. DanielsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wisconsin Dairy Fresh, Inc. v. Steel & Tube Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Flood v. MargisDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API