Oosterwyk v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
The only question involved on this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that the lien of $1,500 was reasonable. Appellant Oosterwyk, acting as his own attorney, dealt with many matters in his brief and oral argument which are outside the record and can have no bearing on the decision in this case.
The razing of the appellants’ buildings, out of which this action arises, was done by the town of Granville pursuant to the provisions of sec. 66.05, Stats. Sub. (1) of said section provides that where, in the judgment of the inspector of buildings of a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Gehr v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Gimbels Midwest, Inc. v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Oosterwyk v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Oosterwyk v. CorriganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.