State v. Alfonsi
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*474Gordon, J.
Criminal Intent in Bribery.
On a number of occasions this court has had to decide whether guilt under a given statute required a specific criminal state of mind. In the recent case of State v. Croy (1966), 32 Wis. (2d) 118, 145 N. W. (2d) 118, the accused was charged under sec. 943.21, Stats., with leaving a hotel without paying his bill. An earlier Wisconsin statute had explicitly required an “intent to defraud,” but in the amended statute that phrase was omitted. We stated in the Croy Case, at page 122, that notwithstanding the amendment, “the statute requires a specific intention…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. StoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KilloryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.