United States v. Fager
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Brian Ford Fager appeals the denial of his Motion to Suppress a firearm police officers discovered on his person during a roadside frisk. We must decide whether the officers’ concerns for their own safety gave them the requisite reasonable suspicion to frisk Defendant. We hold that these concerns sufficiently justified the frisk under the totality of the circumstances and affirm.
I
On February 10, 2014, Deputy Justin Dobler of the Topeka Police Department stopped Defendant’s car around 8:00 p.m. for a turn signal violation near an apartment complex in a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. GuruleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. GorhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. GuruleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Dyab v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Montgomery v. CruzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.