Legal Opinion

Pettis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 1, 1970No. 1 Div. 622PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, Justice.

The complainant-appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, called State Farm, issued to the respondent-appellant, Robert C. Salley, an automobile liability policy, agreeing to pay on behalf of the insured damages within prescribed limits, which the insured might become legally obligated to pay, because of bodily injury or property damage to others caused by accident arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of appellant Salley’s automobile.

The insurance also applied to non-owned automobiles ttnder the policy while being used by the named insured, Salley,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryan v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Lunney v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co. v. SmallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Royal Indemnity Company v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. MFA Ins. Companies v. MendenhallNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API