Reeves v. Madray
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
“The only question is whether the evidence was sufficient to withstand a nonsuit. In deciding that question we must construe the evidence most strongly in favor of the plaintiff. Highsmith v. National Linen Service Corp., 63 Ga. App. 112 (10 S. E. 2d 237); Watkins v. Dalton Coda-Cola Bottling Co., 66 Ga. App. 848 (19 S. E. 2d 316); National Land & Coal Co. v. Zugar, 171 Ga. 228 (2) (155 S. E. 7). A motion for nonsuit should not be granted when there is any evidence tending to sustain the plaintiff’s action, or when the jury can fairly infer from the evidence a state of facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- National Land & Coal Co. v. ZugarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- East & West Railroad v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Yarbrough v. Cantex Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDougal v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Hall v. Sidney Clotfelter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Wilder v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960