Hall v. Sidney Clotfelter, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
1. The petition alleged that the defendant utility was negligent in that it did not prevent or take any steps to prevent electricity from arcing from its uninsulated high tension wires through a wet water oak tree 'to a boom through the erection equipment on which the plaintiff was working and into the plaintiff’s body. There was evidence that three months before plaintiff’s injury an employee of the defendant utility saw that the water oak tree was grown up into the transformer and wires but did not report or take any action about it. There was testimony that a tree that has been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Brown v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Rountree v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Gray v. SchlappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965