Legal Opinion

City of Brunswick v. Peoples Savings Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court.— Hon. Arch B. Davis, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEulison, P. J.

This is an action on a certified bank check and defendant’s answer was in the nature of an interpleader.

Plaintiff city was about to let a paving contract and one John P. Meek was a prospective bidder for the work. Under the regulations of the city it was necessary that a bidder should pay five hundred dollars, or deposit a certified check for that sum as an assurance of his good faith in bidding and his intention to do the work, if the contract should be awarded to him. Meek thereupon drew his check on defendant bank in favor of plaintiff: for five hundred dollars and had the bank certify it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blair & Hoge v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  2. Heartt v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Born v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Metropolitan National Bank v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Minot v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lafayette-South Side Bank & Trust Co. v. SiefertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. State Bank v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maxwell v. DurhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Bathgate v. Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Brandon v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API