Legal Opinion
T-Mobile US, Inc. v. Aio Wireless LLC
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 3, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-2478PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION* SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW1
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG (together, “T-Mobile”), moved for a preliminary injunction to stop the defendant, Aio Wireless LLC, from using a plum color as a central part of its trade dress for consumer wireless telecommunications services and products. Telecommunications companies use color as an integral part of elaborate marketing campaigns to identify the sources for various consumer products and services. Familiar examples include…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- AMID, Inc. v. Medic Alert Foundation United States, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Board of Regents of the University of Houston System ex rel. University of Houston System v. Houston College of Law, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Helpful Hound, L.L.C. v. New Orleans Bldg. Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
- Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Rust-Oleum Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.