Legal Opinion
Carl v. Daniels, Jr., and James E. Speeney v. Florida Power & Light Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1963No. 19924PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Daniels and Speeney, filed separate libels in personam against Hess ■Fuel Oils, Inc., their employer, and Florida Power & Light Company, appellee, to recover for personal injuries which allegedly arose out of the unseaworthiness of a vessel owned by Hess on which they were employed, and the negligence of Florida Power. 1 Their claims against Hess were settled prior to trial, and the consolidated causes proceeded against Florida Power. The libels were dismissed by the trial court for failure to establish negligence on the part of Florida Power after…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Glenn Paul Baker, Sr., Cross-Appellant v. Raymond International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Florida Fuels, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- National Marine Service, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Haskins v. Point Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Williams v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.