Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. King

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2017No. 3251 EDA 2015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

The Commonwealth appeals under Pa. R.A.P. 313 from an order precluding it from interviewing Appellee Jerome King’s trial counsel (“trial counsel”) ex parte in advance of a Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”)1 hearing. The- Commonwealth claims it has the right to interview trial counsel before the hearing because Appel-lee’s claim of ineffective assistance constitutes a waiver of the attorney-client and work-product privileges. We conclude that we have jurisdiction to decide this appeal under the collateral order doctrine embodied in Rule 313. We further hold that any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API