Commonwealth v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
The Commonwealth appeals under Pa. R.A.P. 313 from an order precluding it from interviewing Appellee Jerome King’s trial counsel (“trial counsel”) ex parte in advance of a Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”)1 hearing. The- Commonwealth claims it has the right to interview trial counsel before the hearing because Appel-lee’s claim of ineffective assistance constitutes a waiver of the attorney-client and work-product privileges. We conclude that we have jurisdiction to decide this appeal under the collateral order doctrine embodied in Rule 313. We further hold that any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019