Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
JUSTICE DONOHUE, Concurring
I concur in the result of the Majority's decision. Specifically, I agree with the Majority that the PCRA court did not err in precluding the Commonwealth from conducting an out-of-court interview with trial counsel in advance of the PCRA evidentiary hearing, and that the Superior Court's decision should be affirmed. I also agree with the Majority that the preclusion order at issue should be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.1 I cannot, *515however, join in the Majority's application of that standard. The Majority evaluates the trial court's exercise of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Norton, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.