Legal Opinion

Flatt v. Country Mutual Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1997No. 4-96-1004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

An insured filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to hold his insurer liable under the terms of an underinsured motorist (UDIM) provision in his insurance policy. The trial court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss, and the insured appeals, claiming: (1) the insurance policy’s provision requiring actions for UDIM coverage to be brought within two years of the accident violates public policy; and (2) provisions of the policy are conflicting and ambiguous, requiring the application of the 10-year statute of limitations for contract actions in this case. We affirm.

I

This case involves…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. GENERAL CAS. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. JuhlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Hermanson v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Coronet Insurance Co. v. FerrillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Vansickle v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parish v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Reliance National Insurance Co. v. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. v. Arny BergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Parish v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API