Legal Opinion

Rubinson v. Rubinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to annul a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

Plaintiff sues to annul her marriage on the ground of fraud. She asserts that for the purpose of inducing her to consent to the marriage the defendant falsely and fraudulently represented to her that he would marry her according to the required Hebrew religious ceremony; that relying thereupon, on August 1, 1919, she married the defendant in the office of the city clerk; that at that time she did not realize that she had been legally married; that in response to the clerk’s question in regard to a Jewish ceremony the defendant replied that it would be held shortly thereafter; that the parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Moore v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells v. TalhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Borgstedt v. BorgstedtNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rosza v. RoszaNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Villani v. VillaniNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API