Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerald J. Oakes, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1993No. 92-30500PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Jerald Oakes, Jr. appeals his mandatory minimum sentence of five years imprisonment for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(vii). Oakes, a first offender, argues (1) that the government violated his due process and equal protection rights by prosecuting his ease in federal court; and (2) that his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment because it is disproportionate to his personal history and crime. We reluctantly affirm.

This case illustrates some of the problems with the mandatory minima contained in 21 U.S.C. § 841. Congress enacted the mandatory…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Willard Cortez RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Roseli Banuelos-Rodriguez, Aka: Rogelio Banuelos-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Martinez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Oakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
  4. United States v. One Parcel Property Located at 427 & 429 Hall StreetDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  5. United States v. EdmondsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API