Legal Opinion
R D Manufacturing Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided April 21, 1969No. C.D. 3792PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ Rao, Chief Judge:
These protests, which were consolidated for the purposes of trial, involve certain merchandise described on the invoices as signatures. The merchandise was classified by the collector of customs at the port of entry as articles composed wholly or in chief value of paper lithographically printed, not specially provided for, not over 0.012 inch thick, under paragraph 1406 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential Proclamation No. 3468, 97 Treas. Dee. 157, T.D. 55615, and Presidential Proclamation No. 3513, 98 Treas. Dec. 51, T.D. 55816, and was assessed with duty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Macmillan Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Harvard University v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- R. D. Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970