Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Glidden Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1955No. 3172PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, Justice.

On March 1, 1952, the Blousing Authority of the City of Borger, Texas, referred to herein as Housing Authority, as owner, entered into a contract with E. M. Lambert & Son, hereinafter referred to as Lambert, as contractor, for the construction of what, is designated as P. H. A. Housing Project No. TEX 36-1 to be located on its property at Borger, Texas. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, referred to herein as, Aetna, was surety on a performance and payment bond given by Lambert for more- than one million dollars in connection with said contract. Lambert partially performed this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Loumparoff v. Housing Authority of City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Miers v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. South Texas Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glidden Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. West Texas Utilities Company v. IrvinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gene Duke Builders, Inc. v. Abilene Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  4. Varo, Inc. v. KrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Gene Duke Builders, Inc. v. Abilene Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API