Legal Opinion
Varo, Inc. v. Kross
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 14, 1974No. 4675PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.
The issue presented in the instant case is whether a manufacturer’s representative is entitled to commissions for sales made by him and accepted by the manufacturer but not paid for by the prospective purchaser.
Robert Kross formerly Robert Huebscher brought suit against his former employer, Varo Inc., seeking recovery of sales com missions allegedly earned pursuant to a Manufacturer’s Representative Agreement. His claim for commissions is based upon agreements between Varo Inc., and third parties, being (1) a purchase agreement from Ramah Marketing Corporation, (2) a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Myers v. Gulf Coast Minerals Management Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
- Harbin v. SealeTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Skelly Oil Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saenz Motors v. Big H. Auto Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Monesson v. Champion International Corp., Del-Mar DivisionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Time Insurance Agency, Inc. v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Gawlik v. Padre Staples Auto Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- James T. Jackson, Sr. v. Thomas W. Carlson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.