Legal Opinion

Pantazis v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1942No. 13197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee to recover damages for alleged personal injuries received while a passenger on one of appel-lee’s street cars. Judgment was rendered for appellee on the verdict of a jury, from which this appeal was prosecuted. The assignments relied upon for reversal relate exclusively to the alleged misconduct of the trial judge. It seems that, at first, the jury returned into court a verdict finding appel-lee guilty of actionable negligence in several respects, acquitted appellant of contributory negligence, but found that the injury complained of resulted from an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Easton v. DudleyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Traders & General Insurance v. CarlisleTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. KaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Kuykendall v. Johnson Funeral ParlorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GideonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company v. CouringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API