Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Colonial Insurance of California

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1992No. C3-92-1259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Colonial Insurance appeals from a summary judgment holding it primarily responsible for payment of basic economic loss benefits to its insured, Sandra Peterson.

Colonial claims primary coverage should be provided by respondent, the insurer of the police vehicle she occupied when injured, We affirm.

FACTS

Sandra Peterson was injured in an automobile accident that occurred when she was a passenger in a car driven by Winona County Sheriffs Deputy Timothy O’Brien. On the day of the accident, Peterson and O’Brien were working undercover for the Southeastern Minnesota Narcotics…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Dakota Fire Insurance Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API