Legal Opinion

Blackmon v. Gilmer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1930No. 7 Div. 971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The suit is on an attachment bond. Fkom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

The attachment suit arose from a collision of defendant Blackmon’s automobile with that of plaintiff. Blackmon filed suit in the court of common pleas of Caihoun county claiming damages to his car in the sum of $100 charging simple negligence. He made affidavit and bond and had plaintiff’s car attached. This attachment was dissolved, but Blackmon upon the merits recovered a judgment which was paid.

Count 2 in the present suit is rested upon the theory that the attachment levy was void as unauthorized by law,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. PepperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Norton v. BumpusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Byars v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Hill Grocery Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Austin v. Tennessee Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Myers v. RedmillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Wert v. GeeslinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Brown Shoe Co. v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API