Legal Opinion

Brown Shoe Co. v. Schaefer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1942No. 6 Div. 984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question here is the application of that feature of section 1005, Title 7, Code of- 1940, which provides that, “Personal property in the custody of a trustee in bankruptcy, exempt to the bankrupt, cannot be garnished.”

In this case appellant sued Scharff on a claim of damages for obtaining the purchase by him from plaintiff of specific items of personal property by making false representations of his solvency. Such a claim is not released by a discharge in bankruptcy. Bankr.Act, § 17, 11 U.S.C.A. § 35; 6 Amer.Jur. 812, section 504.

Before that suit was filed, Scharff filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Booth v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Northern v. HannersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Erlenbach v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Graham v. AzarSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Voge v. OlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Harris v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API