Brown Shoe Co. v. Schaefer
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The question here is the application of that feature of section 1005, Title 7, Code of- 1940, which provides that, “Personal property in the custody of a trustee in bankruptcy, exempt to the bankrupt, cannot be garnished.”
In this case appellant sued Scharff on a claim of damages for obtaining the purchase by him from plaintiff of specific items of personal property by making false representations of his solvency. Such a claim is not released by a discharge in bankruptcy. Bankr.Act, § 17, 11 U.S.C.A. § 35; 6 Amer.Jur. 812, section 504.
Before that suit was filed, Scharff filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Booth v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Northern v. HannersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Erlenbach v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Graham v. AzarSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Voge v. OlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Harris v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956