Byars v. James
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit on contract resulted in judgment for plaintiff.
Count 1 declared for breach of contract in the failure to repair the roof of the warehouse, claimed damages proximately resulting therefrom, and specified the same, viz.:
“Cotton stored therein was damaged on account of leaks in the1 roof in said sum of $913.-95, whieh the plaintiff was required to pay the owners of said cotton.”
Defendants had the right to have specification of the nature of the contract, whether based on sufficient consideration, and, to this end, to know whether the contract was verbal or written (Birmingham R., L. & P.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Oregon Steamship Co. v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Anniston Electric & Gas Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sorrell v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Tooson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Gandy v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.