Legal Opinion
Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 25, 1997No. Civ. A. Nos. 95-4026-GTV, 95-4027-GTVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action for damages alleging defendants violated Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., and the Kansas Wiretap Act, K.S.A. 22-2518, and invaded their privacy by intercepting, using, and/or disclosing the contents of plaintiffs’ private telephone communications. The case *1310is before the court on defendants Hoferer, the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe), and Reardon’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 206). These defendants seek summary judgment on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- James Thompson v. Denise Dulaney Elsie Dulaney Phil Dulaney Dale Brounstein Russ Sardo Robert Moody Jerry KobelinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pamela A. Dorris v. Charles Absher and Della AbsherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Smith v. Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- HILL v. McKINLEYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Tinius v. Carroll County Sheriff DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.