Legal Opinion

State v. Votava

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. 72238-2PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

Defendant Daniel Votava claimed error in his jury trial conviction for actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. At trial, the district court judge refused to instruct the jury regarding the defense of moving the vehicle safely off the roadway because Votava did not personally drive it off the roadway. *181Because the trial court erred in refusing the instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

According to his trial testimony, Votava went drinking with friends at the Goodtimes Pub in Spokane in mid-April 1999. Afterward, he agreed to give his friend a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. C.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API