Legal Opinion
State v. Wenger
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided July 22, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 1-955PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHAM, Chief Judge.
This is a tort action instituted by the State of Georgia to recover damages alleged to have resulted from a conspiracy to violate its revenue and regulatory laws with respect to intoxicating liquors and to violate the federal law and Constitution in regard thereto. In substance the complaint charges defendant, as a coconspirator, with selling and shipping to certain other coconspirators within the State of Georgia intoxicating liquor subject to Georgia tax and warehouse charges in the amount of $395,340.00, and evading said tax and warehouse charges. It is charged that as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parrott & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Moungey v. BrandtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1966
- Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Indiana Wholesale Wine & Liquor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Florida Department of Business Regulation v. Zachy's Wine & Liquor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997