Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Two questions are presented upon this appeal. One is whether recovery may be awarded for the partial performance only of a contract where the other party thereto has received and retains benefits by reason of snch partial performance. The other is whether in an action wherein plaintiff seeks such a recovery counterclaims may be interposed by defendant based upon damages alleged to have been sustained in part by reason of plaintiff’s failure to complete the contract and in part by the allegedly negligent manner in which plaintiff in certain respects attempted the performance thereof.

The first…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Rice v. Brooklyn Ash Removal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Trachsel v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fry v. WeyenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bradfield v. BollierOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gillis v. GilletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API