Legal Opinion

Reisinger-Siehler Co. v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1933No. [No. 36, April Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

William H. Perry, the appellee, was on June 22nd, 1932, employed by the appellant Reisinger-Siehler Company. He had been in continuous employment there for fifty-two years. He was employed to look after the building generally, or, as expressed by him, he was “responsible for the building.” His regular hours of employment were from 6 o’clock in the morning until 6 o’clock in the evening. In addition thereto, he was subject to call at any time, and was “liable to put in eighteen or twenty hours” a day. The additional hours of work were at times when he would be called from his home to his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Harrison v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  3. Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Barclay v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Maryland Paper Products Co. v. JudsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Pariser Bakery & State Accident Fund v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API