Locust Cartage Co., Inc. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
The Motor Carrier Act of 1935 forbids common carriers to engage in transportation without filing a tariff, 49 U.S.C. § 317(d), and obliges such carriers to charge their published rates “for transportation or for any service in connection therewith”. 49 U.S.C. § 317(b). Relying on these provisions, appellant Locust Cartage Co., Inc. brought suit in a Massachusetts state court against appellee Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., seeking to recover the difference between Locust’s published rates and the rates it charged Trans-american over a two year period. Transamerican…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Matthew B. Connolly, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Elaine L. Klicker and Robert A. Klicker v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.