In Re the Marriage of Huff
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yollack
We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ unpublished opinion in In re Marriage of Huff, No. 89CA1190 (Colo.App. Feb. 21, 1991). Both the wife and husband assert multiple errors in the court of appeals opinion. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
*246I.
The wife and husband were married in 1958. At the time of their marriage, the husband had graduated from both college and law school. The wife had graduated from college.
In 1961, the wife and husband resided in Boston where the husband returned to school and obtained a master of law degree. While in Boston,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Carlson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Endres v. EndresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of HartleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In re the Marriage of de KoningSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.