Legal Opinion
In re Marriage of Rooks
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 29, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 16SC906PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 In vitro fertilization ("IVF") has given individuals and couples who are unable to conceive conventionally the opportunity to have genetic children. IVF technology permits the pre-embryos created through this process to be cryogenically frozen and later implanted in the carrier's uterus to be brought to term. IVF thus allows individuals and couples to delay childbearing while preserving the pre-embryos and the possibility of future children. However, when married couples turn to this technology and later divorce, IVF can present a host of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- In re Marriage of Hogsett & NealeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- In re the Marriage of Edi L. HOGSETT v. Marcia E. NEALESupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Penniman v. Univ. Hosps. Health Sys., Inc., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2019
- Brooks v. RaemischColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.