Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, C. J.

— I. The propositions relied upon for reversal are that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment; that the court erroneously instructed the jury on circumstantial evidence. Undisputed facts may be stated as follows: Otto Mitchell, prose-outing witness, was engaged in the business of hauling stock and grain to market between Pierson, where he lived, and Sioux City. On the night of August 20, 1923, he had made a trip to Sioux City with a load, and on the night of the 21st, shortly before midnight, he left Sioux City on his return to Pierson, proceeding homeward on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NashSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  2. State v. MaloySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. State v. CanalleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. State v. QuiramSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API