Legal Opinion

State v. Quiram

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. File No. 6683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIS'ER, :C.

Appellant was convicted of making intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The evidence shows that, about sundown on July loth, at his home in Beadle county, appellant was told by one Palmer that he was “going to run off a batch” of moonshine that night; that, between lo and II o’clock p. m., defendant reached Palmer’s place about 15 miles distant, having had two punctures on the way over, and driving the last mile on the .rim. When he got there, Palmer was running off some whisky in a cave a few rods from Palmer’s house. It took appellant about a half hour to fix his tire. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. FarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchaferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. SteenslandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API