Legal Opinion

Dahlen Transport, Inc. v. Hahne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1961No. 38,333PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming an order of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission granting to respondent a certificate of convenience and necessity.

Respondent, Newton G. Hahne, is an individual doing business as Hahne OH Company out of Virginia, Minnesota, and for some time has held authority from the Railroad and Warehouse Commission as a petroleum carrier for the transportation of petroleum products from terminals at New Brighton to various points on the Iron Range and from the origin point of WrenshaH to St. Louis County excluding the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  4. State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API