Legal Opinion

Nassar v. Hughes

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 7, 1994No. 01-93-00515-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

Appellant, Gregory A. Nassar, sued appel-lees, Bill Hughes, Bruce Fridley, and Jack Turner, for breach of fiduciary duty and for actual fraud and fraud in the inducement. In addition, he sued Turner for accounting malpractice. The trial court granted a motion for instructed verdict on Nassar’s fraud in the inducement claim against Turner. The jury found in favor of Hughes and Fridley on Nassar’s fraud in the inducement claims against them, and judgment was rendered for appellees.

Nassar contends that, before he rested, the trial court erred by striking various portions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Moseley v. Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. State v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. McCallTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dewayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Propac Industries, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  3. State v. LewallenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Wedgeworth v. Kirskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Stearns v. MartensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API