Legal Opinion

State v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1982No. C-581PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The question presented is whether the State of Texas, in a suit to recover civil penalties authorized by section 16(b) of article 911b,1 the Motor Carrier Act, had to allege and prove that the violation was done with knowledge or intent. The State sued Houdaille Industries, Inc., to recover civil penalties and for judgment permanently enjoining Houdaille from aiding and abetting the transportation of its products over Texas highways by an uncertificated carrier. The State alleged that Houdaille *724on sixty-six separate occasions commencing on January 5, 1978, and continuing to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woon Hur v. City of Mesquite, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  2. Moseley v. Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Slentz v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. N.P. v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API