Legal Opinion

State v. Lewallen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 18, 1996No. 2-96-090-CRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Appellee Gerald Wayne Lewallen was charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. When the ease was called for trial on February 8,1996, Lewallen appeared with counsel, but the State failed to appear. In the State’s absence, Lewallen’s counsel made a motion for “directed verdict” on the basis that the State had failed to prove the elements of the offense with which Lewallen was charged. The trial judge granted the motion and found Lewallen not guilty. Eleven days later, the State filed its notice of appeal pursuant to article 44.01(a)(1) of the Texas Code…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GeorgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Curry v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Nassar v. Hughes, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  4. Homme v. VaringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Huddleston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. Carnley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  3. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  4. State v. Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  5. Nicholson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API