Foos v. Scarf
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. By the deed from Clarke to Foos in December, 1878, therein mentioned, Clarke granted, bargained, sold, assigned, transferred, set over, quit-claimed and released, unto the said Foos, his executors, administrators and assigns, all the right, title and interest which he, the said Clarke, might have in and to the lot and premises described in the deed of August, 1851, from Clarke to…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. By the deed from Clarke to Foos in December, 1878, therein mentioned, Clarke granted, bargained, sold, assigned, transferred, set over, quit-claimed and released, unto the said Foos, his executors, administrators and assigns, all the right, title and interest which he, the said Clarke, might have in and to the lot and premises described in the deed of August, 1851, from Clarke to Robinson set out in the opinion. And by the deed from Lanahan in December, 1878, mentioned in the opinion, Lanahan…
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The decree from which this appeal is taken determines that the leasehold property mentioned in the proceedings belongs to the heirs, distributees and legal representatives *307■of George W. Scarf, deceased, that the appellant, James Eoos has no interest therein, and that the same he sold for the purpose of partition among the parties entitled thereto. The facts necessary to be stated are as follows :
1st. In February, 1848, Scarf conveyed by deed certain leasehold property on Howard Street in the City of Baltimore to Alex. G. Robinson, in trust for the sole and and separate use of his wife Ann…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jackson v. RobinsNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Maryland Mutual Benevolent Society of the Improved Order of Red Men v. ClendinenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Benesch v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Andrews v. BrumfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Balls v. DampmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Dawson v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.