Legal Opinion
State v. Royce
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 17, 1992No. 10959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The state, with the permission of the trial court,1 appeals from the trial court’s granting of its motion to dismiss, filed by the state after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test. In his motion to suppress, the defendant claimed that the test was taken as a result of an arrest not supported by probable cause. The trial court agreed and granted the defendant’s motion to suppress. Claiming that it would be severely handicapped in presenting its case without the suppressed evidence, the state moved for a dismissal under State v. Ross,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- In re Keijam T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MerrittConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. GuessConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. PierogConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. One 1993 Black Kenworth W-900 Truck & One TrailerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.