Mabra v. SF, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
Ronald E. Mabra, Sr., and All-Pro Foodservice, Inc. filed suit against various defendants asserting claims for tortious interference with existing and prospective business and contractual relations, and conspiracy to tortiously interfere with those relations. Mabra and All-Pro appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6) for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Under OCGA§ 9-11-12 (b) (6),
[a] motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted should not be sustained…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Novare Group, Inc. v. SarifSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Stendahl v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Tidikis v. Network for Medical Communications & Research, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Andrew Feldman v. American Dawn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Mindy Howerton v. Harbin ClinicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Healthy-It, LLC v. Subodh K. AgrawalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- U.S. Capital Funding VI, Ltd. v. Patterson Bankshares, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
- Justin Lee v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.