Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Martin

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Lorene Carlton, an infant, instituted this action, by her next friend, to recover damages for injuries received by her, growing out of a collision with an automobile which was being operated by J. J. Martin and Douglas Dodson. The case was tried by a jury and a verdict was returned in her favor for $500.00 against all of the defendants. The court upon the motion of the defendants set the verdict aside and entered final judgment in their favor. The grounds of the motion of the defendants to set aside the verdict were that it was contrary to the law and the evidence; that there was no evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Williams v. Lynchburg Traction & Light Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. R. G. Lassiter & Co. v. GrimsteadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
  4. Richmond Traction Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Overton's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. DungeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Boyd v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Driver v. BrooksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  4. Wash v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  5. Bickley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API