Blankenship v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, rendered April 17, 1894, in an action of trespass on the case wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The plaintiff, who was an infant ten years of age, was run over by an engine and tender of the defendant company, in its yard in the city of Richmond, and for the injuries done him he brought an action by his next .friend. Upon a trial of the cause there was a verdict and judgment for the defendant. To that judgment this writ of error was awarded.
*453The first assignment o£ error is to the action of the court in refusing to allow one of the witnesses of the defendant to be asked upon cross-examination if he did not remember that at the last trial of the case, he did not state anything about…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Norfolk & Western R. v. Dunnaway's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Tucker's Adm'r v. Norfolk & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
3Cited by33 opinions
- Pettyjohn & Sons v. BashamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Washington & Old Dominion Railway v. Ward's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Morris v. Florida Central & Peninsular RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
- Lucas v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.