Legal Opinion

In re Acquiring Title to Nagy Street

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to amend in condemnation proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

An unusual situation is presented upon this motion. It is fortunate that it is unusual, for it shows that the rights of property owners have not been regarded. This situation is created by a change of decision by the board of estimate of the city. This proceeding was authorized by that board in November, 1905, and again by further resolution in March, 1907, and a still further amended resolution was adopted in June, 1911. The commissioners were appointed in November, 1911. The proceeding contemplated the opening of Nagy "street from Metropolitan avenue to Grand street. Hearings were had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People v. President & Trustees of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. In the Matter of Comrs. Wash. ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Corporation of New York v. MapesNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  5. Nehasane Park Assn. v. . LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohocton Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API