Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gitlin v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2005No. 85181Published

1ConcurrenceSean C. Gallagher, Judge

{¶ 20} I concur with the majority opinion, but write separately to clarify the law pertaining to the application of R.C. 2323.51 to a motion for sanctions filed after a case has been voluntarily dismissed.

{¶ 21} In Soler v. Evans, St Clair & Kelsey (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 432, 763 N.E.2d 1169, although the Supreme Court of Ohio stated that the word “judgment” as used in R.C. 2323.51 means “final appealable order,” it used this phrase in the context of a voluntary dismissal. In that case, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her action after various defendants were granted summary judgment. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Soler v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Grossman v. Mathless & Mathless, C.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Soler v. Evans, St. Clair & KelseyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. J. Richard Gaier Co. v. KesslerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API