Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Independent School District No. 2142

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 2002No. C7-01-1208PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Relator, a teacher who was rehired immediately after voluntary retirement, challenges by writ of certiorari the school board’s determination that he did not have continuing contract status. Because relator’s continuing contract status was terminated by his retirement, we affirm.

FACTS

In 1980, respondent Independent School District 2142 hired relator Robert Thomas as a math teacher. 1 In 1983, relator completed his three-year probationary period and became eligible for continuing contract status, which he attained when he was offered and accepted his next contract. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Mohn v. Independent School District No. 697, ElevethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wirt v. Parker School District 60-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Montplaisir v. Independent School District No. 23Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API