Legal Opinion

Montplaisir v. Independent School District No. 23

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 2010No. A09-1047Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge. *

In this certiorari appeal from a decision of respondent Independent School District No. 23 not to renew his teaching contract, relator Steven Montplaisir argues that the district erroneously subjected him to an additional one-year probationary period when he had previously attained continuing-contract status in the district, resigned, and was rehired. We conclude that the additional one-year probationary period applies to relator. Affirmed.

FACTS

The relevant facts are undisputed. Relator was initially employed as a teacher by respondent school district from the 2000 —…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Keller v. Independent School District No. 742Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API