Montplaisir v. Independent School District No. 23
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge. *
In this certiorari appeal from a decision of respondent Independent School District No. 23 not to renew his teaching contract, relator Steven Montplaisir argues that the district erroneously subjected him to an additional one-year probationary period when he had previously attained continuing-contract status in the district, resigned, and was rehired. We conclude that the additional one-year probationary period applies to relator. Affirmed.
FACTS
The relevant facts are undisputed. Relator was initially employed as a teacher by respondent school district from the 2000 —…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Keller v. Independent School District No. 742Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.