Legal Opinion
Pigott v. DETROIT, T. & IR CO.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 10, 1953No. Civ. A. 12130PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
This matter arises on a motion of the intervening defendant, the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (hereinafter referred to as the Brotherhood), to dismiss the complaint herein and the restraining order issued pursuant thereto.
The Brotherhood is the bargaining representative, as authorized by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 152, Fourth, of certain crafts and classes of the employees of the defendant, Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as the Railroad). The eleven plaintiffs, employees of the Railroad, belong to a rival union, United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- General Committee v. M.-K.-TR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- J. R. Alabaugh v. The Baltimore And Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Paul A.. Pigott v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Johns v. Baltimore & OR Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.